Posts Tagged ‘Levy Mwanawasa’

BOOK REVIEW: IT’S HOW WE END THAT MATTERS

Thursday, August 19th, 2010

TITLE: IT’S HOW WE END THAT MATTERS, Leadership Lessons From an African President

AUTHOR: MARTIN KALUNGU BANDA

PRICE: K150, 000.00 (Hard Cover), K100, 000.00 (Paper Back)

PUBLISHER: Author House

PAGES:  171, Chapters – 17

By Emmanuel Mwamba

My favourite author on leadership, Jo Owen stated that:

“There has been a long search for the alchemy of leadership; we all want to find the elusive pixie dust that we can sprinkle on ourselves to turn us into glittering leaders. Few of us however, are likely to become the ideal mix of Nelson Mandela and Lord Nelson.”

Martin Kalungu-Banda has preoccupied himself with leadership principles and this shows in his work.

His latest book; “It’s How We End That Matters- Leadership Lessons from an African President,”  fits into what seems to be his lifelong commitment to help us become good or great leaders. He makes us stand on the shoulders of giants that have walked this narrow path and helps us learn lessons from their experiences.

Martin’s earlier bestseller; “LEADING LIKE MADIBA – Leadership Lessons from Nelson Mandela” presented us with leadership intrigues that Mandela tackled and resolved. The book offered us the essence of leadership and helped us understand its crucial features through the eyes of one of Africa’s famous son.

ABOUT THE AUTHOR

Martin is a consultant in organisation and leadership development for Presencing Institute (Boston), and the Commonwealth Business School (London). He is also a Core-Faculty Member of the University of Cambridge Program for Sustainability Leadership.

He was a lecturer and initiator of a course of Business Ethics at the University of Zambia.

This book his based on the experiences drawn from his most famous political job – as Special Consultant to President Levy Patrick Mwanawasa between the periods 2005 – 2008.

IT’S HOW WE END THAT MATTERS – Leadership Lessons from an African President.

Like his earlier book, his latest project takes a similar format. He discusses leadership principles or its essence by telling us a story of an encounter, an event, a function, or a discussion and explains the principles or solutions to each story through a tail-end he calls; “Food For Thought”.

In his latest book, he has juxtaposed Mandela with Mwanawasa.

But this book is different. It is a very personal book for Martin. The experiences, feelings, frustrations, or sense of loss or achievements as told in the book, are his own.

When President Mwanawasa decided to re-create the position of Chief of Staff at State House, he offered it to Martin.

Earlier, Martin’s team had conducted workshops on Servant Leadership for Cabinet Ministers and Permanent Secretaries in 2003.

Martin felt that a Chief of Staff ought to be someone who knew the President before his rise to that office, who could relate to him as a colleague so that he could be challenged as a peer. He felt that a Chief of Staff needed to engage the President, despite his overwhelming authority, in a genuine dialogue.

Martin didn’t see himself as that man.

He recognized that this office needed a person to coordinate the work of the President with his advisers, cabinet ministers, interest groups and the public.

In the end, Mwanawasa and Martin agreed that he becomes “Special Consultant” performing the functions of the Chief of Staff. Initially he was to do this job for a period of one year until Mwanawasa had found someone suitable for the job. Martin stayed for three years.

In this book, Martin deliberately chose to reflect stories on the positive side of Mwanawasa stating that “I believe that we human beings do not inspire one another by looking at each other’s weakness. It is the creative side that uplifts us, showing us new and better ways to live.”

Martin chose to narrate the stories by referring to these events and telling them in a conversational manner as he vividly remembered them.

This dramatization of events makes the book refreshing to read and portrays them in a natural manner.

But one would ask – Is this book about Mwanawasa? Or is it about Martin Kalungu-Banda? Or is it about leadership?

After reading all the chapters I realized that the book encompasses all these elements as the author wants us to discover and reflect on “our own leadership style and practices”.

It’s a soft book; tender in the manner it handles the difficult life of Mwanawasa, from his controversial first election, to his poor health, his relationship with his ministers, his views about his predecessors, Dr. Frederick Chiluba and Dr. Kenneth Kaunda, or Cooperating Partners. The book also handles Mwanawasa’s relations with his wife, Maureen and his children.

It also touches on policy issues and his political desires. Martin was privileged to be given by Mwanawasa a written document outlining the vision and values that guided his presidency. He was asked to learn them by heart and has the guidelines have been reproduced in this book.

To exemplify and make leadership principles or lessons come to life, the author picks on numerous stories that are sensitive, that are hilarious, that are serious, that are reflective, and that brings humanity to what it is to be a leader.

For example, the book tells of a story when Ntembe, the youngest daughter of Mwanawasa, abruptly decided to steal the limelight of the 2005 African Freedom Celebrations. Without her parents knowledge or approval Ntembe walked in a frolicking manner, up-to the Master of Ceremony and TV personality, Doreen Mukanzo. The young lady surprisingly, negotiated to be given an opportunity to do a performance.

Doreen joyfully gave the young lady an opportunity. Ntembe performed a rendition of “Kano Nkaku Gette” accompanied it with a serious dance!

She got a long standing ovation at the end of the performance from the packed audience.

The following day, Mwanawasa shared with Martin informing him that he hoped that Ntembe would keep her free spirit even in adulthood.

The book also portrays a Mwanawasa that was pained by strong press reports and editorials against him and his government.

Mwanawasa was reputed to have a hot temper. He held on to his views so strongly sometimes that he couldn’t hear the voices of others.

Martin tells many stories on this matter. But one case comes to mind. Mwanawasa hosted a meeting at State House with Civil Society groupings on the protracted constitution making process. In the meeting, Reuben Lifuka, Vice Chair at Transparency International and Martin supported the calls for a Constituent Assembly.

Although Martin was from State House he supported the position of Civil Society Organisations on the Constituent Assembly in a prominent manner. Mwanawasa curtly interrupted him “Mr. Kalungu-Banda, you are misleading the meeting into thinking that people’s will is any calls that people make…” Mwanawasa always called him “Martin”. Therefore his official tone to him indicated a deeper disapproval.

Although many perceived Mwanawasa to be stubborn and unyielding to advice, Martin found this to be sometimes a mere misunderstanding. In the book, he demonstrates that he helped Mwanawasa change his views on a few cardinal issues. Martin also feels that Mwanawasa merely held on to some views or principals so strongly that he could not see himself abandoning them.

In one case, Martin tells of a story. He had organized a meeting for former Heads of State from the Region to a workshop on HIV/AIDS. He invited Mwanawasa to officiate it. But he agonized on whether to invite Dr. Chiluba owing to the frosty relationship between the two.

When he finally approached Mwanawasa to discuss the matter, he was met with strong questions from Mwanawasa; “Who is being invited?” “What is the position of Dr. Chiluba?” “Martin fairness is a concept you must learn about……the fact that the State has taken Dr. Chiluba to court does not mean that he has lost his status as a former president.”

In another case while Martin was away. Upon his return, he found that Mwanawasa had issued a scathing attack on first president, Dr. Kenneth Kaunda.

In the Cabinet Meeting that day, some Ministers congratulated Mwanawasa for his strong remarks against Kaunda with one aptly encouraging him “you put him in his place”.

Martin was grieved. After the cabinet meeting, he accosted Mwanawasa about his unkind remarks about Kaunda. And Martin further expressed surprise and was baffled that some of Mwanawasa’s colleagues had even congratulated him over such negative remarks against the founding father of the nation.

After much persuasion, Mwanawasa agreed to make the apology to Dr. Kaunda. Since his reprimand against Kaunda was in public, it was decided that the apology would only be only be suitable if it was made publicly too.

This resulted in the famous statement made by Mwanawasa at the press conference. He unreservedly apologised to Dr. Kaunda for the remarks he had made the previous week and stated that Kaunda was the father of the nation. He said the first president’s place in history was guaranteed and did not depend on what he said or did now. He emphasized that Dr. Kaunda had earned this position by successfully leading the country from colonialism.

Other interesting chapters are those dealing with Mwanawasa meeting or talking to ordinary people. This is when the author discusses the different personas leaders tend to have. They are usually friendlier, more honest in person and in private, than when they are in public and engaged in their official duties.

In this case, Martin highlights private or ordinary persons that included Maimbolwa Zimba from Zambia National Commercial Bank, Jean Phiri and a lovely couple Dr. Kachinga Sichizya and Dr. Veronica Sunkutu.

Jean Phiri a secretary at State House had never met the President! The story leading to how she eventually met him after Martin mentioned it to the President is emotional. It resulted in a gesture that benefited all staff. They received personal Christmas goodwill and wishes from the President.

The couple Dr. Kachinga Sichizya and Dr. Veronica Sunkutu had abandoned lucrative contracts and opportunities in South Africa, Australia and Europe and came to Zambia to settle and contribute in their own way, to the growth of this country. Dr Sichizya who is part of Zambia’s only neurosurgeons and his wife a radiologist, returned and the couple is now stationed at the UTH.

When Martin shared the sacrifices of this couple, Mwanawasa immediately demanded to speak to them. Martin called Dr. Sichizya (who is his personal friend too) from his mobile phone and handed the phone to Mwanawasa.

“Dr. Sichizya, this is Levy.” A startled Sichizya retorted “Which Levy is this?” “Levy Patrick Mwanawasa, the President” came the stern reply!

A happy Dr. Sichizya kept on talking about this phone call, a small gesture from the President that truly made him feel appreciated and the couple’s sacrifices worthy of note.

Martin has a way of telling the stories that captivates you and frequently stuns you when the punch line is delivered or when the proper meaning finally dawns on you.

While travelling to Kigali, Rwanda, Martin had an opportunity to sit with the President so that they could catch up on work. “Martin have you been to Kigali?” He had not been to Rwanda.

Mwanawasa bent in a low voice “I hear there are beautiful women.” Martin had to recover quickly wondering where the President was taking the conversation. “Yes Sir, they have very beautiful women. My young brother just got married to one.”

After a moments silence, the President delivered his punch line “But you know that there is HIV/AIDS, don’t you?”

The stories are numerous. They are historical and give insights into Mwanawasa’s rule.

The 2006 Elections is portrayed as a difficult, agonizing and harrowing experience that describes a three day cliff-hanger for both Martin and Mwanawasa (and probably all members of his administration).

When the urban election results started pouring in, Mwanawasa was trailing PF leader, Michael Sata.

After two days, Mwanawasa phoned Martin and broke the bad news.” I think the people of Zambia have rejected us. I have just been talking to my secretary asking her to begin to pack my personal items from the office.”

It was only the third day when the full picture emerged after results from the rural areas began to change the status quo that there was welcome relief and an upbeat Mwanawasa phoned Martin to come get back to work and help him deliver on the new mandate.

In this book, maybe by working as Special Consultant, Martin was distant enough to do a professional job and give his client a fair assessment but he was also close enough to experience leadership and its challenges firsthand.

He also answers his own questions about leadership. What makes a leader great? Is it the wall of academic credentials? Or is it the charisma or popularity? Or is the eloquence? Or is elements from all these?

It’s also a book that would help aides and colleagues of a leader. How can one give good advice without descending to sycophancy owing to the weight of such an office as the presidency?

How can a gulf be bridged between the governors and the governed? How can the apparent double life of a leader be united into an authentic persona reflecting his/her personal values stripped of artificiality that protocols, regulations and procedures bring about?

This book has also helped bring forth many lessons using the experiences of the two on; courage, believing in yourself, honesty, the humility to say sorry, family values, and other issues that confront leaders or those things that make or break a leader.

His work with Mwanawasa must have been a profound experience that Martin has even developed a set of leadership qualities he has aptly called “the LPM Way of Leadership”. He has identified universal qualities that can be seen in leaders such as Nelson Mandela, Mahatma Ghandi including Mwanawasa and others.

The values include those on; truth telling, courage and respect for others.

CONCLUSION

This is a small volume. But the book has taken the path of Martin’s earlier work. It is inspiring, earthy and a sure handbook for persons pursuing their dreams.

It has an obscure design and might be hard to spot out on the bookshelf. I wondered why the cover design was not made more attractive.

Martin’s earlier book had an attractive jacket. It had a beaming Nelson Mandela in a bright red shirt clenching his fist standing out from a dark background. Or did Martin hope to exploit the famous image of Mandela whose face is recognizable across the world?

Or did he wonder what to put on the front page of his new work? It just struck me that the book appeared to have been designed down to make it subtle or inconspicuous.

Martin is working on his third book; “On the Wings of Others; How to Access Life’s Greatest Opportunities.” after enjoying reading this new book, I look forward to this upcoming project.

(Contact us at editor@zambianewsfeatures.com)

I NEVER SAID THAT ABOUT LEVY – CHILUBA

Thursday, July 1st, 2010

By ZAMBIA NEWS FEAURES CORRESPONDENT

Former President Frederick Chiluba has denied he said “the late President Levy Mwanawasa turned courts into playground like Nkana Stadium in eight years.”

Dr Chiluba is said to have spoken about unemployment, the poor state of social infrastructure such as roads, compensation due to families of the BGRIMM Disaster (in which over 46 workers of the explosive factory died), the requests made by ex-miners to the former president to help them engage in economic activities and their concerns about the Chinese investments in the area that was allegedly excluding local participation. (Read related stories here and here)

In a statement by Dr Chiluba’s assistant, Emmanuel Mwamba e-mailed to Zambia News Features, the former president’s team was surprised at the press allegations reported by The Post but chose to ignore “these false reports fearing that our rebuttal would dignify this lie.”

Dr Chiluba’s team was “alarmed that this fabrication is now a basis for comments and reactions from politicians such as Mr Michael Sata.”

Said the statement: “It should be noted that the meeting was a closed door session and members of the media were not present. This meeting was an initiative called by leaders of this community and no member of the media was present.

“It is therefore not surprising that the press reports emanating from this meeting are malicious and full of distortions and fabrications because the reports have relied heavily on the account of informers with unknown motives, who claim to have attended the meeting.

“In the usual fashion of pettiness of politics in Zambia, reactions and opinions are now being formed on a statement that was never made. We therefore urge opportunistic commentators such as Patriotic Front leader Mr. Michael Sata and the so called “Dr” Cosmo Mumba, to seek clarifications and the truth before making wild statements and demands.”

The statement said it was a well known fact that Dr Chiluba was a former president who was in retirement but this not exclude him from attending to petitions from members of the communities who sought his intervention in matters they deemed were delayed or stuck and urged him to use his position as former president to expedite them or obtain a solution.

The statement said the desperate panic Dr Chiluba’s team was seeing from Mr. Sata and certain sections of the media over the former president’s activities was strange, committing resources to trailing him, planting mobs to embarrass him or pursuing him.

“This is now interfering with his fundamental freedom of movements, of expression and other rights. We wish to advise that the planned activities against Dr Chiluba are becoming criminal and the Police should not hesitate to pursue the perpetrators,” the statement said.

It said it was important for Sata and others to accept that Dr Chiluba had declared his irrevocable support for President Rupiah Banda, a choice that should be respected without question.

“Zambia is now a democracy and the right to choice is a fundamental right that cannot be taken away by Mr Sata and others,” the statement said.

Meanwhile, a group of cooperating partners met with President Banda at State House in Lusaka, Thursday, at which they discussed Zambia’s political and economic developments, according to a statement released by State House press aide Dickson Jere.

The cooperating partners comprising mostly EU member countries, pledged to continue supporting the government’s development programmes.

The cooperating partners meeting with President Banda follows statements that have been recently been made by Mr Banda himself and other Zambian politicians about them undermining the country’s sovereignty. (Read related story here).

(Edited by Gershom Ndhlovu. Contact Us at editor@zambianewsfeatures.com)

THE COURT JUDGEMENT THAT HAS SPLIT ZAMBIANS

Tuesday, August 25th, 2009

By Correspondent

When Zambia’s second republican President Frederick Chiluba was acquitted for alleged theft of US$500,000 during his tenure of office by High Court deputy registrar Jones Chinyama, sitting as a magistrate, Zambian internet forums went abuzz. Most of the posts in e-mails that were exchanged from small groups of friends to large groups of e-mail lists with those against the acquittal pitted against those for the court decision.
One e-mailer who will only be identified by his initials, BM, wrote: “So he has been acquitted. Personally, I am happy for him and his family!! The bible says rejoice with those who are rejoicing and likewise mourn with those who are mourning. The big question though remains, ‘Was this trial a proper allocation of the nation’s meagre resources?
“I am just wondering why some people somewhere in the world are not on trial for the war in Iraq. What lessons ca we draw from all this? Any views?”
Another contributor, RM, wrote: “While some people will definitely unashamedly rejoice over this great injustice and misjudgement the huge chunk that he mutilated… will never be recovered…the Zamtrop, the truck loads of dollars, designer suits, shoes, even neck ties… name it all, damn it… the whole loot is gone…, and to crown it all, the guy is sent off with a part on the back! He is smiling, and people are there cheering without shame, as if he is a great hero! What kind of people are we, what kind of standards are we setting? Hearts must bleed with discontentment whenever there is a travesty of justice, but now the hearts are already singing hymns of praises!”
One contributor, KC, wrote that it was easy to be accused and deemed guilty in Zambia and most African nations. (President) Levy (Mwanawasa)’s decision to prosecute FTJ (Chiluba) was not based on facts but rather political and to a large extent malicious.
“Just evaluate,” KC wrote, “how charges have mutated from the ones that were presented to parliament to lift FTJ immunity to the ones finally determined by the courts. Check how many billions the man was accused of looting to the USD500,000 that was allegedly backed by evidence. Clearly when a decision to go for FTJs neck was made, no serious investigations were done prior to the drama to prosecute the man. In fact the plunder happened on the white side of the case; billions paid to private prosecutors, millions of pounds paid to UK based lawyers, task force expenses to find some form of ‘evidence’.”
KC wrote that there was need to avoid emotions and prejudicial attitudes when dealing with peoples lives and that facts should be allowed to speak for themselves.
“No human being is perfect regardless of their socio-economic and political status. Not even this contributor is perfect. Jesus said ‘remove a log from your eye before you remove a spec of grass from your neighbour’s eye.’ If you labour to find a fault in any human being you can find it. Even people that killed Jesus, who is the son of GOD managed to find a fault or faults and killed him. Yet he was innocent,” KC wrote in his e-mail contribution.
Another contributor, PMN wrote in response to KC: “…Or facts were there but we failed to package them in such a way as to convince the judge to find the culprit(s) wanting. It could also be that the adjudicator has decided to look elsewhere away from the facts.”

PMN said that people knew all know about Carlington, the (undelivered) arms purchases and Katebe Katoto and those serious millions (that) have vanished from the nation’s coffers. Companies which participated in this looting have since been liquidated and are no more, PMN wrote.
CM stated that the invisible hands at play in this case have virtually rendered the Zambian judicial system impotent.
“I know that we have discussed the creation of sound institutions in Zambia countless times on this forum and once again, we see a reason for that. I like the answer given by the PF/UPND pact when asked if they would petition the Chitambo election in court, they simply said “what courts?” Chiluba is guilty despite what this judge says.”
CM asked how else Regina Mwanza Chiluba would be found guilty for receiving stolen property.
CM wrote that Zambians needed to move away from a situation where the President was the appointing officer and paymaster of judicial officers. Positions like Chief Justice, Inspector General of Police and Elections Commission of Zambia chairperson should be ratified and be answerable to parliament. “Until we see a desire to build institutions that outlive individuals, we will continue to face such injustices,” wrote CM.
VM, in response to one contributor wrote: “Irrespective of how you feel about this verdict, can’t you see that Zambian judges render their verdicts based on the inclinations of the Plot 1 occupant? This was so true for the late LPM and a lot more evident in the case of RB.
“Until the Zambian constitution is redone to make the Vice President a running mate, among other real changes to bring about checks and balances, the President of the Republic of Zambia will remain the judge, the jury and the executioner. Please, let us get out of our cocoons of FTJ adoration or hate and look at the root cause of this maladministration of justice that has existed for decades now, and will continue to do so, if the injustice system is not fixed, constitutionally. I hope the NCC (National Constitution Council) are taking very good notes regarding what this verdict underscores.”
These views are just some of those shared on various e-mail lists, what is not known are the views of hundreds of thousands of other Zambians with neither access to the internet nor access to mainstream media. It is also difficult to say which Zambians President Rupiah Banda thanked for accepting the Chiluba judgement.
Evidently, the same judgement seems to be splitting people and organisations right in the middle. Some NGOs are against it while others which are known to be pro-state on numerous issues are in support of it. The church is equally split with the Catholics among those vehemently against it while various Pentecostal churches with whom Chiluba fellowships, in support.